Sign in or 
Share this
2b. Include Mixed Scale Groups in Standards
Priority votes received by Wingspread participants: 0
How this is important spreading certified Family Forests: Applies Family Forest Standards on small properties (<1000 hectares) within a group that also has large properties (>1000 hectares).
Two-Year Goal: Guidance on this issue included within FSC Family Forest Standards & Policies
Strategy addresses what current barriers? Applying SLIMF policies at the property level rather than the group level
And/or builds on what opportunities? Apply SLIMF benefits & standards on smaller properties in group.
A few example(s) of where model or elements are being practiced well today?Columbia Forest Products, The Nature Conservancy (examples of groups with both small and large certified properties)
Key measures to track (to know a change is an improvement)?
…………….
To move it quickly forward (through a test or to spread to other early adopters):
Additional Action Plan Notes:
How this is important spreading certified Family Forests: Applies Family Forest Standards on small properties (<1000 hectares) within a group that also has large properties (>1000 hectares).
Two-Year Goal: Guidance on this issue included within FSC Family Forest Standards & Policies
Lead individual/organization:
| Supporting Partners: (please add name if want to play active role on moving this strategy forward) |
Strategy addresses what current barriers? Applying SLIMF policies at the property level rather than the group level
And/or builds on what opportunities? Apply SLIMF benefits & standards on smaller properties in group.
A few example(s) of where model or elements are being practiced well today?Columbia Forest Products, The Nature Conservancy (examples of groups with both small and large certified properties)
Key measures to track (to know a change is an improvement)?
…………….
To move it quickly forward (through a test or to spread to other early adopters):
| Key Next Steps? | Involves Who? | Date Complete? | |
| By End of August 2007 |
|
|
|
| By End of 2007 |
|
|
|
| By Summer of 2008 |
|
|
|
|
WarrenG |
Latest page update: made by WarrenG
, Aug 5 2007, 4:43 PM EDT
(about this update
About This Update
Edited by WarrenG
1 word added 1 word deleted view changes - complete history) |
|
Keyword tags:
None
More Info: links to this page
|
| Started By | Thread Subject | Replies | Last Post | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| brfc | This is more important than it's votes indicate | 0 | Jul 24 2007, 4:55 PM EDT by brfc | ||
|
Thread started: Jul 24 2007, 4:55 PM EDT
Watch
This item is important because of the supergroup issue, however it's also importnat to the smaller groups which are in danger of being overrun by the rush to meet industry's demands. We once again have procurement-driven forestry dominating the discussion, when, for most family forest owners, this is not a priority.
H |
|||||
Showing 1 of 1 threads for this page
